This big awful essay I wrote on early modern approaches to the problem of theodicy and their potential links with the logic of capitalist apologetics is just too much of a mess for anyone to want to publish in its present state, and I won’t have time to devote to overhauling it for quite awhile.
I think there’s a lot of interesting stuff in it, though, and it’s a shame for all that work to go to waste. So here it is!
Abstract: In this article, I reconstruct the central aspects of an extended debate between Leibniz, Malebranche, and Arnauld concerning the nature of the will of God and the restricted economy of salvation, known as the ‘Jansenist controversy.’ I show that their respective positions exemplify different visions of the hierarchy of divine attributes, and disagreements concerning the nature of God’s volition and its relationship to the good. The article seeks to contribute to the philosophical and historical study of early modern theology and metaphysics, and at the same time to develop resources for a critique of capitalist political theology.